Ebook The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel
The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel. What are you doing when having extra time? Chatting or surfing? Why do not you aim to review some e-book? Why should be reading? Reviewing is one of fun and also enjoyable activity to do in your spare time. By reading from numerous sources, you could discover new details as well as experience. Guides The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel to read will many beginning from scientific e-books to the fiction e-books. It means that you could review the books based upon the requirement that you intend to take. Naturally, it will be different and you can review all book types whenever. As here, we will certainly show you an e-book should be checked out. This e-book The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel is the selection.
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel
Ebook The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel
The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel As a matter of fact, book is truly a home window to the world. Even lots of people could not like reviewing publications; guides will always give the specific details about reality, fiction, experience, journey, politic, religious beliefs, and also more. We are below a site that provides compilations of publications greater than guide store. Why? We give you great deals of varieties of link to get the book The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel On is as you require this The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel You could locate this publication quickly right here.
Sometimes, checking out The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel is really uninteresting and also it will take long period of time starting from getting the book as well as begin reading. Nevertheless, in modern-day age, you can take the establishing innovation by using the net. By net, you can see this web page and also start to search for guide The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel that is needed. Wondering this The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel is the one that you need, you can opt for downloading. Have you understood how you can get it?
After downloading and install the soft documents of this The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel, you could begin to read it. Yeah, this is so delightful while somebody ought to review by taking their large books; you are in your new method by only handle your device. And even you are operating in the office; you could still make use of the computer system to review The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel fully. Certainly, it will not obligate you to take several web pages. Just page by web page depending on the moment that you have to review The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel
After knowing this very simple means to read as well as get this The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel, why do not you inform to others concerning through this? You can tell others to visit this website as well as go with searching them favourite books The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel As known, right here are bunches of lists that supply numerous type of publications to collect. Merely prepare couple of time and web links to get guides. You could actually take pleasure in the life by checking out The Case Against Perfection: Ethics In The Age Of Genetic Engineering, By Michael J. Sandel in a really easy manner.
Breakthroughs in genetics present us with a promise and a predicament. The promise is that we will soon be able to treat and prevent a host of debilitating diseases. The predicament is that our newfound genetic knowledge may enable us to manipulate our nature―to enhance our genetic traits and those of our children. Although most people find at least some forms of genetic engineering disquieting, it is not easy to articulate why. What is wrong with re-engineering our nature?
The Case against Perfection explores these and other moral quandaries connected with the quest to perfect ourselves and our children. Michael Sandel argues that the pursuit of perfection is flawed for reasons that go beyond safety and fairness. The drive to enhance human nature through genetic technologies is objectionable because it represents a bid for mastery and dominion that fails to appreciate the gifted character of human powers and achievements. Carrying us beyond familiar terms of political discourse, this book contends that the genetic revolution will change the way philosophers discuss ethics and will force spiritual questions back onto the political agenda.
In order to grapple with the ethics of enhancement, we need to confront questions largely lost from view in the modern world. Since these questions verge on theology, modern philosophers and political theorists tend to shrink from them. But our new powers of biotechnology make these questions unavoidable. Addressing them is the task of this book, by one of America’s preeminent moral and political thinkers.
- Sales Rank: #44828 in Books
- Brand: Brand: Belknap Press
- Published on: 2009-09-30
- Released on: 2009-08-24
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 7.00" h x 4.25" w x .50" l, .34 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 176 pages
Features
- Used Book in Good Condition
From Publishers Weekly
Our quest to create the perfect athlete or the perfect child reflects our drive for mastery and domination over life, says Sandel, a Harvard professor of government and a former member of the President's Council on Bioethics. In this evenhanded little book, which grew out of an essay in the Atlantic, Sandel says this quest endangers the view of human life as a gift. Allowing genetic engineering to erode our appreciation for natural gifts and talents, Sandel says, will affect how we understand humility, responsibility and solidarity; it deprives parents of "the humility and enlarged human sympathies that an openness to the unbidden can cultivate." (The discussion of perfect children also gives Sandel an opportunity to rag on hyperparenting, a trend he sees as a similar expression of parents' desire for dominion.). In addition, if we all possess varying gifts and talents, then as part of our solidarity with others in our society we should share our gifts with those who lack comparable ones. Although Sandel's book treads over heavily traveled territory, it turns in a different direction from the standard arguments that the problem with bioengineering is that it deprives individuals of autonomy. (May)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Booklist
Why does improving our physical and mental capabilities through genetic engineering give us pause? Sandel acknowledges religious positions on that question but, striving for universality, sticks to secular philosophy to answer it. He bases his argument on the principle that life is a gift, which cannot be scientifically proven but which very nearly all people understand and appreciate. It isn't difficult to accept genetic engineering to heal the effects of disease and disability, but enhancing the capabilities of healthy persons or of children even before conception comes to seem increasingly iffy as Sandel expands on the problems of the souped-up athlete and the so-called designer child. Against the argument that individuals and responsible parents have the right to seek maximal capability for themselves and their offspring, Sandel poses the specter of overweening mastery of nature, which historically has led to such ill effects as environmental degradation and genocide. An illuminating ethical analysis of stem-cell research concludes this stellar work of public philosophy. Ray Olson
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
Sandel explores a paramount question of our era: how to extend the power and promise of biomedical science to overcome debility without compromising our humanity. His arguments are acute and penetrating, melding sound logic with compassion. We emerge from this book feeling edified and inspired. (Jerome Groopman, Harvard Medical School, author of How Doctors Think)
We live in a world, says Michael Sandel, where "science moves faster than moral understanding." But thanks to Sandel, moral understanding is catching up. Cloning, stem cell research, performance-enhancing drugs, pills that make you stronger or taller: if some scientific development bothers you, but you can't explain why, Michael Sandel will help you to figure out why you're troubled. And then he'll tell you whether you should be. (Michael Kinsley)
In this short and provocative treatise, Sandel, who is professor of government at Harvard and a member of the President's Council on Bioethics, takes on the question of why certain kinds of newly available genetic technologies make us uneasy...[his] book reminds us that the proper starting point for bioethics is not, "what should we do?" but rather, "what kind of society do we want?" And "what kind of people are we?" (Faith McLellan The Scientist 2007-04-01)
The Case against Perfection by Michael Sandel is a brief, concise, and dazzling argument by one of America's foremost moral and political thinkers that brings you up to speed on the core ethical issues informing current debates about genetic engineering and stem cell research. (Gabriel Gbadamosi BBC Radio)
In the future, genetic manipulation of embryos is expected to have the potential to go beyond the treatment of diseases to improvements: children who are taller, more athletic, and have higher IQs...In The Case against Perfection, Michael Sandel argues that the unease many people feel about such manipulations have a basis in reason...This beautifully crafted little book...quickly and clearly lays out the key issues at stake. (Gregory M. Lamb Christian Science Monitor)
Given the vast gulf between progressive and conservative thinking, the time is ripe for a philosopher to take on the issues of biotechnology. And in The Case against Perfection Harvard's Michael Sandel does just that, attempting to develop a new position on biotechnology, one that, like Sandel himself, is not easily identified as either left or right. A former member of the President's Council on Bioethics, Sandel is uniquely well suited for this task, and to challenge the left to get its bearings on the brave new biology...Sandel poses an important challenge to contemporary progressives who have failed to grasp the importance of the emerging biopolitics. (Jonathan Moreno Democracy)
Nobody's perfect, and Mr. Sandel's book makes an instructive and engaging case that that nobody should be. (Yuval Levin New York Sun 2007-05-16)
In a highly readable, wise and little book titled The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, Michael Sandel argues that parents' quest to create the ideal child reflects a drive for mastery and domination over life. (Douglas Todd Vancouver Sun 2007-05-12)
An illuminating ethical analysis of stem-cell research concludes this stellar work of public philosophy. (Ray Olson Booklist 2007-04-15)
[A] graceful and intelligent new book. (Carl Elliott New England Journal of Medicine 2007-05-17)
[Sandel] makes the compelling case that gentic engineering to gain advantage for ourselves and our children is deeply disempowering, because it turns us away from the communal good, toward self-centered striving. (Anne Harding The Lancet 2007-07-28)
Anyone who thinks our culture is too competitive and consumer-driven should find that Sandel's diagnosis resonates. He provides not only a warning about the shape of the future, but equally an indictment of--or at least a call to examine--our individual moral lives and our contemporary social values. Those who support the practice of genetic enhancement argue that the technology is not substantially different from other forms of "enhancement" we use to improve our lives and the lives of our children. Sandel agrees, but he does not base his argument on any particular distinction about the means of enhancement; rather he is deeply concerned about the underlying impetus of mastery and dominion. (Debra Greenfield Bioethics Forum 2007-08-20)
Michael Sandel‘s dive into the sea of genetic engineering provides a great tasty gulp of contemporary ethical controversy. Quickly read, The Case Against Perfection is nonetheless dense with challenging quandaries, loaded with moral puzzles and filled with facts. An inveterate highlighter, I underlined half the book. (John F. Kavanaugh America 2007-08-13)
This rather small book presents, in very succinct fashion, many of the arguments against proposals to bioengineer human life. Sandel...argues with care and clarity not only against the more extreme cases such as human cloning, but also against the more modest proposals of gene modification. As the title suggests, the arguments are almost exclusively negative, although Sandel’s most interesting and creative suggestion is the idea that such human bioengineering will cause human beings to lose the sense of life as a “gift,” and that this will have a serious morally negative effect upon the entire social structure. (P.A. Streveler Choice 2007-09-01)
Sandel's arguments ultimately speak to our gut-level qualms about enhancement; and his aim in fact is to give these qualms a coherent moral basis...His book in the end is more a lyrical plea for reverence and humility than a lawyer's watertight "case against."...The ethicist Michael Sandel wants us at least to think about the line [between health and enhancement], however imaginary--and to think about where, in a hyper-competitive world, re-engineering our natures will ultimately lead. (Michele Pridmore-Brown Times Literary Supplement 2008-04-18)
For many years I have been ambivalent about reproductive innovations, from surrogate gestation to preimplantation screening for gender selection. After reading Sandel's exceedingly elegant little book, The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, I could finally put satisfactory names to core values implicit in my hesitation: acceptance and solidarity. I encountered Sandel's book as a participant in the intellectual discourse about parenting. But the book's greatest value to me was its validation of the commitments of solidarity expressed in my volunteer work on behalf of poor mothers and of acceptance implicit in my determination to mother a child with catastrophic mental illness. (Anita L. Allen Chronicle of Higher Education 2008-05-16)
Most helpful customer reviews
39 of 45 people found the following review helpful.
Short Atlantic Monthly article way better
By txsierra
I bought this book because I really enjoyed the Atlantic Monthly article that preceded this effort. Unfortunately, this book didn't include any additional substance but a lot more fluff. I was totally bored with the effort and pretty disappointed. I would not recommend spending $20 on this book, but rather dig up a pdf of the article and enjoy it instead.
66 of 80 people found the following review helpful.
A very imperfect case
By Danno
Sandel is a gifted, lucid writer, which is why I wish I could give this book more stars. But if I restrict myself just to its substance, I have to confess that more than once I felt like throwing this book across the room or shoving it into my garbage disposal. What an irritating and profoundly misguided book!
Sandel seems to think that using biotechnology, especially genetic engineering, to enhance human life inevitably means encroaching on, and perhaps even destroying, our ability to appreciate the "gifted" character of life itself. The assumption is that appreciating what is "given" (whether by God or nature) requires holding back from enhancing our offspring and ourselves and accepting as normative the abilities and limitations of modern human beings. If we do proceed with genetic enhancements, then, according to Sandel, we are corrupted by a hubristic ethic of "mastery" over what is naturally given. This is wrongheaded--and for two main reasons.
First, Sandel offers very little by way of defense of the normativity of the natural. Although he concedes that not everything that is natural is good (and rightly gives cancer as an example), he tells us almost nothing in this book, beyond appealing to a naïve, static, Aristotelian-style natural law theory, about why the fact that something is naturally given is in any way even relevant to its goodness, let alone why it ought not be improved. If he is going to be any kind of naturalist, he needs to go back and rethink the implications of Darwinian evolution for attempts to identify and enshrine an immutable human essence. (The prospects aren't good.) Beyond that, he needs a response to a long line of critics of Aristotelian naturalism, from Hume to Moore, who with good reason have attacked the idea that one could straightforwardly infer what "ought" to be from what "is." Sandel's Aristotelian naturalism is highly doubtful, and since the rest of his evaluations seem to depend upon it, they would appear to be highly doubtful as well.
Second, Sandel treats the sense of reverence, awe, and mystery that we feel towards nature, including our own current way of being, as if it were a kind of non-renewable resource--as if it were like, say, a finite, exhaustible quantity of petroleum lying under the earth's surface. This is ludicrous. It is much more probable that no matter how much human beings enhance themselves--no matter how tall they can grow themselves, how big they make their muscles, how much more powerful they make their memories, or how much they can genetically enhance the powers of their offspring--they will always be limited both by their environment and by their competition with each other (and possibly other beings). As a result, we will never reach the sort of smug self-satisfaction to which Sandel refers near the end of his book: we will never entirely "banish our appreciation of life as a gift" nor ever find ourselves with "nothing to affirm or behold outside our own will" (p. 100). No doubt there are people (and have for a long time been people) who failed to appreciate what is given them, but this has to do with the lack of a certain kind of sensibility, a kind of imaginative obtuseness. It has nothing directly to do with whether we can make ourselves live somewhat longer, grow somewhat taller, remember more, think somewhat more quickly, and the like. No matter how much we enhance ourselves, there will always be what is "given" relative to that stage of advancement and over which we have no control. We will never become masters of the universe, and, if we really do have enhanced mental abilities, we will not fall into the delusion of thinking that we are.
On the other hand, suppose Sandel is right, and suppose that we actually do have the power to erase the "given" and make ourselves true masters of the universe. I for one have trouble even understanding this possibility. But suppose (probably per impossibile) that it makes sense. Well, in that case, we would have become gods. And, if we really were gods, the accusation against us of hubris would be quite misplaced, wouldn't it?
An earlier reviewer mentioned a similarity between Sandel and Heidegger. Despite my more negative assessment of Sandel's book, that comment seemed to me to be close to the mark, since Heidegger too was a thinker who tended to mistake his own subjective preferences and concerns for deep ontological structures. Sandel doesn't like genetic manipulation and enhancement, and he projects this dislike, ironically in a rather hubristic manner, on a cosmic screen, as if it were deeply revealing of the nature of reality, life, and humanity. But it isn't. If my criticisms are correct, then an ethic of "giftedness," in which we appreciate the naturally given, can coexist with a determination to enhance our abilities and those of our children so as to make all of our lives as good (in our own eyes) as possible.
Don't worry. The universe will take care of reminding us that we have limits.
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful.
Perfect Debate
By Collin T. Corcoran
A Case Against Perfection, which I read in two sittings over 5 hours in one afternoon. I simply could not put the book down, Sandel proposes both sides in the debate of Cloning/Perfomance Enhancement/Gene Therapy etc... Sandel makes you guess and second guess, then triple guess your own beliefs on these issues. In the end, I felt well informed and satisfied with this book. I strongly recommend this book. Not lengthy, fast read, well written.
Enjoy.
See all 26 customer reviews...
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel PDF
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel EPub
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel Doc
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel iBooks
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel rtf
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel Mobipocket
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel Kindle
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel PDF
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel PDF
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel PDF
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, by Michael J. Sandel PDF
